sequenom-genotyped snps Search Results


88
Thermo Fisher c 1972331 10
C 1972331 10, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 88/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/sequenom-genotyped+snps/C___1972331_10/pmc07441357-77-24--1
Average 88 stars, based on 1 article reviews
c 1972331 10 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
88/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Thermo Fisher snp genotyping genomic dna
Snp Genotyping Genomic Dna, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/sequenom-genotyped+snps/DNA/pm16470719-41-6-31
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
snp genotyping genomic dna - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
fluidigm ep1 high throughput gene analysis system
Ep1 High Throughput Gene Analysis System, supplied by fluidigm, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/sequenom-genotyped+snps/EP1/ppr0466443-60-62-67
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ep1 high throughput gene analysis system - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Thermo Fisher assays taqman snp genotyping assay rs56258221 thermofisher cat
Assays Taqman Snp Genotyping Assay Rs56258221 Thermofisher Cat, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/sequenom-genotyped+snps/assays+taqman+snp+genotyping+assay+rs56258221+thermofisher+cat/pmc11293351__mmc2-369-197-203
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
assays taqman snp genotyping assay rs56258221 thermofisher cat - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
BIOTAGE snp genotyping
Snp Genotyping, supplied by BIOTAGE, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/sequenom-genotyped+snps/snp+genotyping/10__1111_slash_j__0022___202x__2005__23604__x-122-4-14
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
snp genotyping - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Thermo Fisher tyk2 rs34536443 snp
Tyk2 Rs34536443 Snp, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/sequenom-genotyped+snps/TYK2+rs34536443+SNP/pmc02987240-26-6-20
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
tyk2 rs34536443 snp - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Thermo Fisher c_469857_10
C 469857 10, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/sequenom-genotyped+snps/C_469857_10/pm22260716-94-19-20
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
c_469857_10 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Sequenom tabbaa d snp genotyping
Tabbaa D Snp Genotyping, supplied by Sequenom, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/sequenom-genotyped+snps/d+genotyping+snp+tabbaa/pm25704208-31-4-10
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
tabbaa d snp genotyping - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
ATCC human jurkat

Human Jurkat, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/sequenom-genotyped+snps/Jurkat%2C+Clone+E6-1/pmc10794781-41-0-3
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human jurkat - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
BIOTAGE pyrogold reagents

Pyrogold Reagents, supplied by BIOTAGE, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/sequenom-genotyped+snps/pyrogold+reagents/10__1111_slash_j__1365___294x__2010__04970__x-80-8-20
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pyrogold reagents - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Promega readit snp genotyping system

Readit Snp Genotyping System, supplied by Promega, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/sequenom-genotyped+snps/readit+snp+genotyping+system/us10704087-565-8-12
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
readit snp genotyping system - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Thermo Fisher snp apoe c 3084793 20
Statistical models.
Snp Apoe C 3084793 20, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/sequenom-genotyped+snps/SNP+APOE%2C+C___3084793_20/pmc07455192-312-14-23
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
snp apoe c 3084793 20 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Journal: Cell Genomics

Article Title: A cis -regulatory element regulates ERAP2 expression through autoimmune disease risk SNPs

doi: 10.1016/j.xgen.2023.100460

Figure Lengend Snippet:

Article Snippet: Human: Jurkat , ATCC , TIB-152TM.

Techniques: Recombinant, Western Blot, Protease Inhibitor, TaqMan SNP Genotyping Assay, Reverse Transcription, Derivative Assay, Software, Clinical Proteomics, Sequencing, HiChIP

Statistical models.

Journal: Science Advances

Article Title: Unmasking selective path integration deficits in Alzheimer’s disease risk carriers

doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aba1394

Figure Lengend Snippet: Statistical models.

Article Snippet: The APOE SNPs were genotyped using the ABI PRISM 7700 Sequence Detector (assay ID: C_3084793_20 for rs429358 and assay ID: C_904973_10 for rs7412; Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA) with a TaqMan 5′-allele discrimination Assay-By-Design method (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA).

Techniques:

( A ) Performance (which is inversely related to drop error) is specifically impaired in risk carriers when no supportive spatial cues are available, i.e., in the PPI subtask. ( B ) Risk carriers benefit more from environmental landmarks and boundaries than controls. (A) and (B) depict results from model 1b; results from model 1a are statistically equivalent. ( C ) Incoming (but not outgoing) distance is more closely related to spatial memory performance in risk carriers than controls (model 1c). ( D ) Goal-to-landmark distance (but not goal-to-boundary distance) is more relevant in risk carriers than controls (models 2a and 2b). ( E ) Movement-to-landmark distance (but not movement-to-boundary distance) is significantly lower in risk carriers than controls (models 2c and 2d). Y axes show parameter estimates resulting from the different models; error bars, SEM; * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, and *** P < 0.001. Control, APOE ε3/ε3-carriers; Risk, APOE ε3/ε4-carriers; PI, path integration; BPI, boundary-supported PI; LPI, landmark-supported PI; vm, virtual meters. See also figs. S1 to S3 and tables S1 and S2.

Journal: Science Advances

Article Title: Unmasking selective path integration deficits in Alzheimer’s disease risk carriers

doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aba1394

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Performance (which is inversely related to drop error) is specifically impaired in risk carriers when no supportive spatial cues are available, i.e., in the PPI subtask. ( B ) Risk carriers benefit more from environmental landmarks and boundaries than controls. (A) and (B) depict results from model 1b; results from model 1a are statistically equivalent. ( C ) Incoming (but not outgoing) distance is more closely related to spatial memory performance in risk carriers than controls (model 1c). ( D ) Goal-to-landmark distance (but not goal-to-boundary distance) is more relevant in risk carriers than controls (models 2a and 2b). ( E ) Movement-to-landmark distance (but not movement-to-boundary distance) is significantly lower in risk carriers than controls (models 2c and 2d). Y axes show parameter estimates resulting from the different models; error bars, SEM; * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, and *** P < 0.001. Control, APOE ε3/ε3-carriers; Risk, APOE ε3/ε4-carriers; PI, path integration; BPI, boundary-supported PI; LPI, landmark-supported PI; vm, virtual meters. See also figs. S1 to S3 and tables S1 and S2.

Article Snippet: The APOE SNPs were genotyped using the ABI PRISM 7700 Sequence Detector (assay ID: C_3084793_20 for rs429358 and assay ID: C_904973_10 for rs7412; Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA) with a TaqMan 5′-allele discrimination Assay-By-Design method (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA).

Techniques: Control

( A ) EC gray matter volume predicts performance only during PI with long incoming distances (middle to right panels) and only in risk carriers (model 3b). ( B ) In younger risk carriers, EC gray matter volume predicted performance during PI trials with long incoming distances. In older risk carriers, EC gray matter volume predicted performance during the majority of all trials (model 3b). The young group comprises subjects aged 18 to 28 years; the older group contains subjects aged 53 to 75 years (see age histogram in fig. S1C). As the models contained two continuous predictors, one of them (incoming distance) was discretized into quintiles for post hoc tests and graphical depiction. Thicker lines mark slopes that are significantly different from zero. Y axes show parameter estimates resulting from the different models; shaded areas, SEM. Control, APOE ε3/ε3-carriers; Risk, APOE ε3/ε4-carriers; % volume, percent of whole-brain volume. See also fig. S1 and tables S1 and S3.

Journal: Science Advances

Article Title: Unmasking selective path integration deficits in Alzheimer’s disease risk carriers

doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aba1394

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) EC gray matter volume predicts performance only during PI with long incoming distances (middle to right panels) and only in risk carriers (model 3b). ( B ) In younger risk carriers, EC gray matter volume predicted performance during PI trials with long incoming distances. In older risk carriers, EC gray matter volume predicted performance during the majority of all trials (model 3b). The young group comprises subjects aged 18 to 28 years; the older group contains subjects aged 53 to 75 years (see age histogram in fig. S1C). As the models contained two continuous predictors, one of them (incoming distance) was discretized into quintiles for post hoc tests and graphical depiction. Thicker lines mark slopes that are significantly different from zero. Y axes show parameter estimates resulting from the different models; shaded areas, SEM. Control, APOE ε3/ε3-carriers; Risk, APOE ε3/ε4-carriers; % volume, percent of whole-brain volume. See also fig. S1 and tables S1 and S3.

Article Snippet: The APOE SNPs were genotyped using the ABI PRISM 7700 Sequence Detector (assay ID: C_3084793_20 for rs429358 and assay ID: C_904973_10 for rs7412; Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA) with a TaqMan 5′-allele discrimination Assay-By-Design method (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA).

Techniques: Control

The younger age group comprises subjects aged 18 to 41 ( n = 163), and the older age group comprises subjects aged 42 to 75 ( n = 104). ( A ) Performance (which is inversely related to drop error) is specifically impaired in older risk carriers when no supportive spatial cues are available, i.e., in the PPI subtask. ( B ) In older participants, risk carriers benefit more from environmental landmarks and boundaries than controls. (A) and (B) depict results from model 1b; results from model 1a are statistically equivalent. ( C ) In both age groups, neither incoming nor outgoing distance is more closely related to spatial memory performance in risk carriers than controls. ( D ) In the younger age group, goal-to-boundary distance is more relevant in risk carriers than in controls (models 2a and 2b). ( E ) In younger participants, movement-to-landmark distance (but not movement-to-boundary distance) is significantly lower in risk carriers than in controls (models 2c and 2d). Y axes show parameter estimates resulting from the different models; error bars, SEM. + P < 0.10, * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, and *** P < 0.001. Control, APOE ε3/ε3-carriers; Risk, APOE ε3/ε4-carriers. See also figs. S1 to S3 and tables S1, S2, and S4.

Journal: Science Advances

Article Title: Unmasking selective path integration deficits in Alzheimer’s disease risk carriers

doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aba1394

Figure Lengend Snippet: The younger age group comprises subjects aged 18 to 41 ( n = 163), and the older age group comprises subjects aged 42 to 75 ( n = 104). ( A ) Performance (which is inversely related to drop error) is specifically impaired in older risk carriers when no supportive spatial cues are available, i.e., in the PPI subtask. ( B ) In older participants, risk carriers benefit more from environmental landmarks and boundaries than controls. (A) and (B) depict results from model 1b; results from model 1a are statistically equivalent. ( C ) In both age groups, neither incoming nor outgoing distance is more closely related to spatial memory performance in risk carriers than controls. ( D ) In the younger age group, goal-to-boundary distance is more relevant in risk carriers than in controls (models 2a and 2b). ( E ) In younger participants, movement-to-landmark distance (but not movement-to-boundary distance) is significantly lower in risk carriers than in controls (models 2c and 2d). Y axes show parameter estimates resulting from the different models; error bars, SEM. + P < 0.10, * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, and *** P < 0.001. Control, APOE ε3/ε3-carriers; Risk, APOE ε3/ε4-carriers. See also figs. S1 to S3 and tables S1, S2, and S4.

Article Snippet: The APOE SNPs were genotyped using the ABI PRISM 7700 Sequence Detector (assay ID: C_3084793_20 for rs429358 and assay ID: C_904973_10 for rs7412; Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA) with a TaqMan 5′-allele discrimination Assay-By-Design method (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA).

Techniques: Control